Natalie Solent

Politics, news, libertarianism, Science Fiction, religion, sewing. You got a problem, bud? I like sewing.

E-mail: nataliesolent-at-aol-dot-com (I assume it's OK to quote senders by name.)

Back to main blog

RSS thingy


Jane's Blogosphere: blogtrack for Natalie Solent.



Links

( 'Nother Solent is this blog's good twin. Same words, searchable archives, RSS feed. Provided by a benefactor, to whom thanks.
I also sometimes write for Samizdata and Biased BBC.)


The Old Comrades:



November 2001 December 2001 January 2002 February 2002 March 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 August 2007 October 2007 February 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 March 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 October 2009 January 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 April 2011 June 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Tuesday, February 06, 2007
 
Ticking all the boxes. I get the impression that Mick Waters, Curriculum Director of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA), is trying too hard. As Jack Huges, a commenter to Biased BBC, said of Mr Waters' article:
It's heavy going, because its just babble. In every sentence he tries to tick all the boxes.

So we get "The curriculum should better emphasise and make explicit study and learning in terms of diversity, choice, need and specialism. "

What does this sentence actually mean ? Does it mean anything ? How would we change the school curriculum in the light of that revelation ? And how would we detect if we had hit the target ?

I wonder if its just some kind of programmatically-generated screed - a kind of auto-babble. For example you could put any of the paragraphs in any order and it would be just as meaningless. Does Mick Waters get paid for churning out this tosh ?

[Added later: After re-reading the article, I softened a bit. Mr Waters may even be moving the national curriculum (not that we ought to have one at all) in the right direction. But, oh boy, he needs to be stripped to his undies and passed through the dejargonator before being allowed contact with the public.]

The QCA's anxiousness to be all things to all assessment schemes shows up elsewhere as well. On page 11 of the Times (given the problems on the Times site I won't even try linking) there's an article about how the new proposed changes to the curriculum will bring back traditional teaching methods into the heart of the dustbin. Or possibly vice versa. Tagging along with the main article is a sidebar headed "New methods" and tailed "Source: QCA", which says under the heading "Modern languages" that pupils are to
Learn French, German, Spanish, Italian, Mandarin, Arabic or Urdu. Focus on listening, speaking, reading, writing and grammar.
And for an encore, catch flies with your tongue. Why not? You'll already have proved that you can act like a chameleon when you focussed on four different things simultaneously.


 
Monbiot - voice of sanity.


Monday, February 05, 2007
 
If you're unhappy and you know it, ring the cops.
If you're unhappy and you know it, ring the cops.
If you're unhappy and you know it, and you really want to show it...
If you're unhappy and you know it, ring the cops.

If you're unhappy and you know it, shout out loud.
If you're unhappy and you know it, shout out loud.
If you're unhappy and you know it, and you really want to show it...
If you're unhappy and you know it, shout out loud.

If you're unhappy and you know it, blow your horn.
If you're unhappy and you know it, blow your horn.
If you're unhappy and you know it, and you really want to show it...
If you're unhappy and you know it, blow your horn.

If you're unhappy and you know it, ring up again.
If you're unhappy and you know it, ring up again.
If you're unhappy and you know it, and you really want to show it...
If you're unhappy and you know it, ring up again.

If you're unhappy and you know it, jump up and down.
If you're unhappy and you know it, jump up and down.
If you're unhappy and you know it and you really want to show it...
If you're unhappy and you know it, jump up and down.


(The original version of this post was rather obscure, so I have expanded it. I also felt that a musical setting would render the advice of the Minister on how to assist an old woman being beaten up more memorable to citizens anxious to do the right thing in these difficult times.)

(Cross-posted at Samizdata.)


Sunday, February 04, 2007
 
I've missed you, Britblog roundup, what's new? Why not follow the link* and read this jolly post from Nearly Legal:
Why do people do it? Why do they sign up for joint tenancies with private landlords together with people they have only just met?

I’m sure it all seems terribly exciting, but what are you letting yourself in for with your shiny new shorthold assured tenancy?

You and all the joint tenants are ‘jointly and severally’ liable for the rent. This means you are each liable for all the rent. If your instant friend stops paying rent, the landlord can come after you for it, even if you have been ‘paying your share’. The Landlord can claim it from you, all the tenants or any of the tenants, whichever option seems to offer the best option of getting the money back. This is entirely legal. Fancy getting a County Court judgement for several thousands of pounds?

*It occurs to me that if I give the link here on this blog it defeats the object. You are meant to be rounded up like a naughty decimal 3 fig over the sig and sent to read it at Mr Worstall's.


Saturday, February 03, 2007
 
Dead horse, still needs flogging. You know I said I was still busy? I'm still still busy. But if you pine for my company, the more reactive, and hence quicker, style of blogging at Biased BBC has tempted me out once or twice. And there is always time to get in a last flick at old Dobbin.

The other day I had cause to look again at this old post from 2003 while taking part in a survey of bloggers.

It still bugs me the way people say, "But Saddam Hussein's regime could not possibly have cooperated with Al Qaeda because it was secular," as if that settled the matter.

It still bugs me and they're still saying it. I swear, I wrote most of this post before doing a search on Google News for "Saddam" and "secular" and finding this Washington Times article published all of seventeen hours ago.

Just to show that heartwarming cooperation between secular and religious organisations does happen, scroll down on this post from Moonbat Media to hear a video of Stop The War Coalition marchers chanting, "Khaibar, Khaibar, Ya Yahood, Jaish Muhammad sawfa ya'ood!" ("Khaibar, Khaibar, Oh Jew, the army of Mohammed will return!")

The Chair of the Stop The War Coalition is Andrew Murray of the Communist Party of Great Britain.