Natalie Solent

Politics, news, libertarianism, Science Fiction, religion, sewing. You got a problem, bud? I like sewing.

E-mail: nataliesolent-at-aol-dot-com (I assume it's OK to quote senders by name.)

Back to main blog

RSS thingy


Jane's Blogosphere: blogtrack for Natalie Solent.



Links

( 'Nother Solent is this blog's good twin. Same words, searchable archives, RSS feed. Provided by a benefactor, to whom thanks.
I also sometimes write for Samizdata and Biased BBC.)


The Old Comrades:



November 2001 December 2001 January 2002 February 2002 March 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 August 2007 October 2007 February 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 March 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 October 2009 January 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 April 2011 June 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Tuesday, March 29, 2005
 
Patrick Crozier liked the new Dr Who.
I’ve been trying to puzzle out how it was they got this so right. I imagine that the long break since the last series went out in 1989 was a factor. It gave a new generation the chance to re-invent it, to question every aspect of it and to give it a new feel. I also got the impression that after the (ahem) 1996 Dr Who movie there was an element of “we must not fail”. (Indeed, it’s funny to think how similar in many ways the two were - the difference between success and failure is slight indeed.) And I think there was also a deep desire to keep the tradition alive. To a large proportion of the people involved in producing, writing and directing the new series, Dr Who was something that they were brought up with, like Wimbledon and England World Cup exits. The ball was being thrown to them and they had to make damn sure they caught it. Fortunately, they did.
I agree.

Spoiler alert! Bits I particularly liked:


  • The way that the Doctor, gadget in hand to zap the Nestene Consciousness and save the day, very nearly muffed it by trying to negotiate. Perfectly in character. Remember Genesis of the Daleks? Tom Baker, who has but to bring two contacts together to destroy the Daleks before they have had a chance to exist and wreak havoc throughout the galaxy, is suddenly stricken by conscience and asks himself, in an agony of indecision, have I the right? Hands up who else was yelling from behind the sofa, "YES! GET ON WITH IT!"
  • Having said that, it was also good that the viewer was made to feel just a little bit sorry for the Consciousness.
  • There was a good helping of menace before anything happened. The dummies twitching ... could have been accidental. The noise of the wheelie bin moving ... something you could hear on any street. The skilful buildup of menace did a great deal to compensate for the cheap effects in the original series. It doesn't need money and it sticks in your mind clear across the decades. (Given that I was seven at the time it was shown, I don't actually remember the plot of Terror of the Autons at all well. But - gulp - the little troll doll on the back seat of the car coming to life in the warm, that I remember.)
  • Talking of which, starting off with the Autons was a great idea. The sheer scariness of the original Autons, particularly the ones disguised as policemen, prompted complaints from the Viewers' and Listeners' Association and questions in Parliament.
  • Plastic Mickey. Don't blame Billie Piper for burbling away all un-noticing: how conscientious are you in regularly checking up whether your nearest and dearest have been plasticised?
  • Clive and his website. Yes, that's exactly what would happen. Kudos to the scriptwriters for thinking through what has changed in the Earth's response to the Doctor in the last thirty years. In a similar way, I did admire the way that, in the second Terminator film, the writers had thought through what would have happened to the heroine between films One and Two if she insisted on telling her story (sent to the loony bin) and how she would have brought up her child (as a survivalist).

    Poor Clive is gone, albeit with the comfort of knowing in his last moments that he was right all along, but another will spring up in his place. I hope the Doctor has set up a system of news alerts. Or perhaps not: Dr Who traditionally blurs the question of how much the Earth population and/or authorities know. In the U.N.I.T. timeline, where our co-inhabitors of the Earth the Sea Devils, once appeared on the six o'clock news, then everyone ought to say, oh another alien invasion, pass the mustard. But I don't think we are. Everyone acted too surprised.


There is one strange fact that I can exclusively reveal. The street, ostensibly in London, in which the scene with the wheelie bin took place was actually Inverness Place, Cardiff. What this portends for the future development of the plot I do not know.